Author |
Message |
Pbpix
|
Post subject: browser variations? Posted: May Mon 16, 2022 5:14 pm |
|
Member |
 |
Joined: Jan Thu 01, 1970 1:00 am Posts: 23901 Location: Haledon, NJ, usa
|
Hi guys, What am I doing wrong? My cell phone uses Chrome and the images do not appear. My laptop with Vivaldi and FF works fine, but not with Chrome or Edge, or Opera So i'm having different responses (the images do not appear in Chrome but do appear in FF) here's the posting code:  
_________________ To be a man, Be a non-conformist, Nothing's sacred as the integrity of your own mind. -Emerson
Last edited by Pbpix on May Mon 16, 2022 5:56 pm, edited 2 times in total.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
egg
|
Post subject: Re: browser variations? Posted: May Mon 16, 2022 5:39 pm |
|
Member |
 |
Joined: Jan Tue 31, 2012 1:55 am Posts: 20532 Location: Mountains of Mourne. Ireland.
|
There is every possibility that your photo app or browser is corrupted. You will need to clear all cookies and the cache. Reboot your device afterwards.
Greg.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Pbpix
|
Post subject: Re: browser variations? Posted: May Mon 16, 2022 6:05 pm |
|
Member |
 |
Joined: Jan Thu 01, 1970 1:00 am Posts: 23901 Location: Haledon, NJ, usa
|
I cleared the cache and cookies but the images from the code above do not show up. posted code: [img]http://www.pbpix.com/BELKNAP-1.GIF[/img] The only difference is that the posted code has the "[img]"---"[/img]" in the line But if I enter this string directly in my address window of Chrome the image shows up. http://www.pbpix.com/BELKNAP-1.GIF
_________________ To be a man, Be a non-conformist, Nothing's sacred as the integrity of your own mind. -Emerson
Last edited by Pbpix on May Mon 16, 2022 7:21 pm, edited 2 times in total.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Radiosmoker
|
Post subject: Re: browser variations? Posted: May Mon 16, 2022 6:19 pm |
|
Member |
 |
Joined: Oct Thu 18, 2007 11:34 am Posts: 4089 Location: Port Orchard, Wa 98366
|
What graphics programs do you have? click on, windows Settings, then Default Apps by file Type, They will show which graphics extensions are checked and can be changed. and the list of Windows Picture, Windows Media Player or Power Media Player, Paint, Adobe, etc. and while there you can designate which app you can apply. Or browse for something like this https://www.startpage.com/sp/searchEdit: I digress, I forgot you said Cell phone. But since I won't use a cell phone (privacy). I would guess the same would apply?
_________________ Visit our site: http://antique-radio-lab.forumotion.com/ I was smokinradios in A.R.F. (2004)
Last edited by Radiosmoker on May Mon 16, 2022 7:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
egg
|
Post subject: Re: browser variations? Posted: May Mon 16, 2022 6:33 pm |
|
Member |
 |
Joined: Jan Tue 31, 2012 1:55 am Posts: 20532 Location: Mountains of Mourne. Ireland.
|
I'm not with you. The images are showing here on my Mac. A space is assigned number 32, which is 20 in hexadecimal. When you see ā%20,ā it represents a space in an encoded URL, for example, http://www.example.com/products%20and%20services.html.
Attachments: |

1.png [ 425.13 KiB | Viewed 528 times ]
|

2.png [ 315 KiB | Viewed 528 times ]
|
|
|
Top |
|
 |
SHenion
|
Post subject: Re: browser variations? Posted: May Mon 16, 2022 9:43 pm |
|
Joined: Feb Wed 07, 2018 6:52 pm Posts: 1266 Location: Stone Mountain, GA
|
The images don't show inline here but do show with "show image in new tab." in Chrome.
The links are non-secure (HTTP: vs HTTPS:), most browsers will not show insecure content on a secure page. Tried as https:// and the site does not provide a secure protocol.
_________________ Scott. Powered by infinite improbability drive.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
jimtech
|
Post subject: Re: browser variations? Posted: May Mon 16, 2022 10:20 pm |
|
Member |
 |
Joined: Nov Sun 29, 2020 5:59 pm Posts: 519 Location: Carol Stream, Illinois 60188
|
I have the same problem viewing those image files here using latest Chrome version under Windows 7 or 10. The same images display fine under ie 11 or edge. I've had that problem on ARF using Chrome for some time now, and haven't figured out what specific setting or permission is necessary to correct the issue. It seems to happen most often when viewing images in older threads.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Tom Schulz
|
Post subject: Re: browser variations? Posted: May Tue 17, 2022 1:29 am |
|
Member |
 |
Joined: Mar Sun 01, 2009 10:27 pm Posts: 6404 Location: Ann Arbor, MI
|
SHenion wrote: The links are non-secure (HTTP: vs HTTPS:), most browsers will not show insecure content on a secure page. Tried as https:// and the site does not provide a secure protocol. This is the cause of the problem. Different browsers handle non-secure content differently. antiqueradios uses the secure HTTPS protocol and your site does not.
_________________ Tom
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Pbpix
|
Post subject: Re: browser variations? Posted: May Tue 17, 2022 1:30 am |
|
Member |
 |
Joined: Jan Thu 01, 1970 1:00 am Posts: 23901 Location: Haledon, NJ, usa
|
Tom Schulz wrote: SHenion wrote: The links are non-secure (HTTP: vs HTTPS:), most browsers will not show insecure content on a secure page. Tried as https:// and the site does not provide a secure protocol. This is the cause of the problem. Different browsers handle non-secure content differently. antiqueradios uses the secure HTTPS protocol and your site does not. How can I support it on my site? And why does it only happen when the AR image code is added ie:"[img]"
_________________ To be a man, Be a non-conformist, Nothing's sacred as the integrity of your own mind. -Emerson
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Tom Schulz
|
Post subject: Re: browser variations? Posted: May Tue 17, 2022 1:59 am |
|
Member |
 |
Joined: Mar Sun 01, 2009 10:27 pm Posts: 6404 Location: Ann Arbor, MI
|
Pbpix wrote: Tom Schulz wrote: SHenion wrote: The links are non-secure (HTTP: vs HTTPS:), most browsers will not show insecure content on a secure page. Tried as https:// and the site does not provide a secure protocol. This is the cause of the problem. Different browsers handle non-secure content differently. antiqueradios uses the secure HTTPS protocol and your site does not. How can I support it on my site? And why does it only happen when the AR image code is added ie:"[img]" How is your site hosted? If it is done by a hosting company then they should be able configure their server software to support HTTPS. If it is done on your own computer then you have to get a certificate and configure your server to use it. As for the problem only occurring when using img, img says to display the picture within a page from antiqueradios. and that is where you have insecure content within a secure page.
_________________ Tom
|
|
Top |
|
 |
egg
|
Post subject: Re: browser variations? Posted: May Tue 17, 2022 2:17 am |
|
Member |
 |
Joined: Jan Tue 31, 2012 1:55 am Posts: 20532 Location: Mountains of Mourne. Ireland.
|
It's because this antique radio forum became a secure site one or two years back. (by adding the S to http) Attachment:
x.png [ 28.4 KiB | Viewed 400 times ]
Causing your problem of mixed content. (insecure image - - secure site) adding https to my http sitehttps://www.google.com/search?q=adding+ ... 8&oe=utf-8
|
|
Top |
|
 |
jimtech
|
Post subject: Re: browser variations? Posted: May Tue 17, 2022 2:27 am |
|
Member |
 |
Joined: Nov Sun 29, 2020 5:59 pm Posts: 519 Location: Carol Stream, Illinois 60188
|
So is there any way to instruct Chrome to display insecure content within the secure page on ARF? Is there a rule that can be implemented just for this site? I'd really like to be able to look at the many images on older posts that won't display without having to open another browser.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
egg
|
Post subject: Re: browser variations? Posted: May Tue 17, 2022 2:32 am |
|
Member |
 |
Joined: Jan Tue 31, 2012 1:55 am Posts: 20532 Location: Mountains of Mourne. Ireland.
|
Attachments: |

x.png [ 53.39 KiB | Viewed 393 times ]
|
|
|
Top |
|
 |
ttx450cap
|
Post subject: Re: browser variations? Posted: May Tue 17, 2022 2:55 am |
|
Member |
 |
Joined: May Sun 10, 2020 2:55 pm Posts: 3162 Location: SW, MI
|
ARF is hosted on goDaddy servers or got there domain name though.
_________________ only the dead fish go with the flow
|
|
Top |
|
 |
SHenion
|
Post subject: Re: browser variations? Posted: May Tue 17, 2022 4:42 am |
|
Joined: Feb Wed 07, 2018 6:52 pm Posts: 1266 Location: Stone Mountain, GA
|
Pbpix wrote: Tom Schulz wrote: SHenion wrote: The links are non-secure (HTTP: vs HTTPS:), most browsers will not show insecure content on a secure page. Tried as https:// and the site does not provide a secure protocol. This is the cause of the problem. Different browsers handle non-secure content differently. antiqueradios uses the secure HTTPS protocol and your site does not. How can I support it on my site? And why does it only happen when the AR image code is added ie:"[img]" Ask your hosting site. On mine, it was by adding an SSL certificate and setting up its home directory (to the same directory as my home page as regular HTTP.) [img] will put the image inline (within a secure page). Just a link would open a separate page that can be insecure. Chrome will not by default allow insecure content within a secure page.
_________________ Scott. Powered by infinite improbability drive.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Pbpix
|
Post subject: Re: browser variations? Posted: May Tue 17, 2022 5:03 am |
|
Member |
 |
Joined: Jan Thu 01, 1970 1:00 am Posts: 23901 Location: Haledon, NJ, usa
|
SHenion wrote:
[img] will put the image inline (within a secure page). Just a link would open a separate page that can be insecure. Chrome will not by default allow insecure content within a secure page.
But.... so you are saying it's a browser issue? because Chrome doesn't allow it but FF does allow it ?
_________________ To be a man, Be a non-conformist, Nothing's sacred as the integrity of your own mind. -Emerson
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Alan Voorhees
|
Post subject: Re: browser variations? Posted: May Tue 17, 2022 5:25 am |
|
Joined: Jan Thu 01, 1970 1:00 am Posts: 9967 Location: Baguio City, Philippines
|
Yes, it's a browser issuer. It is done for security, disallowing insecure links on a secure page. Otherwise, it would be much easy for bad actors to disguise malicious content with what appears to be a secure webpage.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
SHenion
|
Post subject: Re: browser variations? Posted: May Tue 17, 2022 5:30 am |
|
Joined: Feb Wed 07, 2018 6:52 pm Posts: 1266 Location: Stone Mountain, GA
|
Pbpix wrote: But.... so you are saying it's a browser issue? because Chrome doesn't allow it but FF does allow it ? Yes, most all sites are now secured via SSL (HTTPS). For about 10 years, browsers have warned or not allowed unsecured web sites. For a while, Chrome would not even give me an option to connect to a local unsecured server. They now have an option to "proceed at your own risk." Surprises me that FF allows it but they do some checks if the content is safe. Typical, Edge is based on the same code as Chrome but Microsoft has reduced the security settings. One of the reasons I never use a MS browser except to download a better one.
_________________ Scott. Powered by infinite improbability drive.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Alan Voorhees
|
Post subject: Re: browser variations? Posted: May Tue 17, 2022 5:46 am |
|
Joined: Jan Thu 01, 1970 1:00 am Posts: 9967 Location: Baguio City, Philippines
|
Google was a big proponent of the push to all HTTPS secure internet and they own Chrome, hence the implementation of the policy.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
jimtech
|
Post subject: Re: browser variations? Posted: May Tue 17, 2022 7:02 am |
|
Member |
 |
Joined: Nov Sun 29, 2020 5:59 pm Posts: 519 Location: Carol Stream, Illinois 60188
|
egg wrote: Thanks but...Been there, done that. Problem persists.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
|
|